Lean body weight (Janmahasatian)
Fat-free mass from sex, weight and height (Janmahasatian 2005)
Sources last checked: 2026-11-03
Lean body weight (Janmahasatian)
Fat-free mass from sex, weight and height (Janmahasatian 2005)
Derived against DXA fat-free mass in 373 adults aged 18–82 with BMI up to about 70 kg/m²; not validated in children, amputees, marked oedema or ascites. A body-composition estimate, not a dosing recommendation.
What is the Lean body weight (Janmahasatian)?
Lean body weight approximates fat-free mass. Janmahasatian and colleagues (2005) derived a semi-mechanistic equation from DXA measurements in 373 adults across a wide size range (weight 41–217 kg, BMI 17–70 kg/m²), so that it does not fall paradoxically at high BMI as the older James equation does.
When to use it
- When a pharmacokinetic protocol or study uses lean body weight (e.g. some anaesthetic agents in obesity)
- Body composition estimates in research or nuclear medicine (SUV normalised to lean body mass)
- Comparing weight descriptors in obese patients
When not to use it
- Children and adolescents
- Marked fluid overload, ascites or amputation, which distort the weight input
- As a dose recommendation on its own
How it is calculated
Men: LBW = 9270 × weight / (6680 + 216 × BMI) Women: LBW = 9270 × weight / (8780 + 244 × BMI)
Clinical pearls and limitations
- Derived against DXA fat-free mass in 373 adults aged 18–82 with BMI up to about 70 kg/m²; not validated in children, amputees, marked oedema or ascites. A body-composition estimate, not a dosing recommendation.
- Unlike the James formula, the Janmahasatian equation keeps rising with weight and does not collapse at very high BMI.
- In older adults (60–65 years) it performed about as well as the Gallagher equation against DXA.
- Lean body weight rises only slowly with increasing fat mass, so it can be far below actual weight in severe obesity.
Frequently asked questions
What is the Janmahasatian formula?
Men: 9270 × weight / (6680 + 216 × BMI); women: 9270 × weight / (8780 + 244 × BMI), weight in kg and BMI in kg/m².
Lean body weight vs ideal body weight — what is the difference?
Ideal body weight depends only on height and sex; lean body weight also rises with actual weight, because heavier people carry more fat-free mass too.
Why not use the James formula?
James' equation gives falling, even negative, values at very high BMI; Janmahasatian was developed to avoid that.
Evidence and guidelines
- Primary source: Janmahasatian S, Duffull SB, Ash S, Ward LC, Byrne NM, Green B. Quantification of lean bodyweight. Clin Pharmacokinet 2005;44(10):1051-1065.
- Puri T, Blake GM. Comparison of ten predictive equations for estimating lean body mass with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in older patients. Br J Radiol 2022;95(1133):20210378 (equation constants restated; validation in 60–65-year-olds).
Have a follow-up question?
Medelix answers clinical questions from current guidelines and studies — every statement with its source.
Related calculators
- Adjusted body weightIdeal body weight (Devine) plus 40 % of the excess weight, for overweight patients
- Predicted body weight & protective tidal volumeTidal volume in mL from predicted body weight (ARDSNet formula) for lung-protective ventilation
- Body mass indexWeight-for-height index
- Body surface area (Mosteller / DuBois)Body surface area from height and weight
Embed this calculatorFree to use on your website, intranet or teaching page. Copy the code below.
<iframe src="https://medelix.ai/en/embed/lean-body-weight" title="Lean body weight (Janmahasatian) – Medelix" width="100%" height="620" style="border:0;max-width:720px" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p><a href="https://medelix.ai/en/calculators/lean-body-weight-janmahasatian">Lean body weight (Janmahasatian) calculator by Medelix</a></p>For healthcare professionals and medical students. These tools support, and do not replace, clinical judgement. Always check results against the original source and your local protocols.